← All case studies
RETAIL · GROCERY / CONVENIENCE

Seven Friction Points, Ranked and Timed

Eye-tracking process analysis of checkout and shelf replenishment in multi-store retail

61%
Store labor hours: checkout + replenishment
40%
Checkout time on register interface
7
Friction points isolated
3:14
Minutes to locate a restock item

The Client

Multi-store retail chain (grocery / convenience format), with standardized in-store processes across checkout and shelf replenishment.

Confidential case study — anonymized. Full details available under NDA upon request.

The Situation

The Intersect Approach

01

Store-Level Eye-Tracking

Cashiers and replenishment staff observed live — attention mapped second by second, friction flagged directly on video.

02

Friction-Point Breakdown

Every friction point isolated, timed, and ranked — from interface layout to planogram and stock-rotation discipline.

What We Measured — Evidence, Not Opinions

Daily in-store labor hours: checkout and replenishment together are the majority of the day.
Objective FindingMeasured Value
Share of total store process time spent on checkout25% (≈ 35 labor-hours/day per store)
Share of checkout time spent interacting with the register interface (buttons/icons)40% of checkout time — ≈ 14 hours/day per store
Share of total store process time spent on shelf replenishment36% (≈ 52 labor-hours/day per store)
Time to identify a non-food product on the shop floor for restocking≈ 3:14 minutes per instance
Distinct checkout friction points isolated via eye-tracking7 individually timed bottlenecks, each 8–35 seconds per occurrence
← scroll to see the full table →

Recommendations — Prioritized by Measured Impact

RecommendationRationale / Expected Impact
Re-arrange register icon layout, prioritizing best-selling productsTargets the 40% / ≈14 hours per day spent on interface interaction
Auto-suggest bulk-item packaging immediately after weighing/scanningRemoves a recurring per-transaction manual search step
Update icons with clear product photos and consistent namingCuts the 8–10-second identification delay measured per icon lookup
Move the loyalty/payment card prompt to just before payment confirmationRemoves an interrupt mid-way through the scanning sequence
Adjust the cigarette planogram to match actual sales mixReduces search time measured at the register for that category
Apply lean replenishment: trolley closer to shelf, minimum two dividersTargets the 3:14-minute product-identification delay in non-food
Schedule stock checks at defined intervals; reinforce FIFO disciplinePrevents chilled over-stocking and reduces shelf-expiry risk
← scroll to see the full table →

Why This Approach Works

The diagnostic replaced “the checkout feels slow” with instrumented, timed data on exactly where staff attention went inside the two highest-labor-hour processes in the store. By flagging each friction point directly on the video footage — rather than relying on a walkthrough or staff self-report — the analysis turned a vague sense of inefficiency into a ranked list of seven specific, fixable friction points, so management could act on what was actually slowing staff down.

Want results like these for your operations?

Book a Pilot Audit →